Optimizing Middle Managers' Performance During Crises: Some Practical Transactional and Transformational Leadership Strategies for Schools

Optimizing Middle Managers' Performance During Crises: Some Practical Transactional and Transformational Leadership Strategies for Schools

Dacia M. Smith
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4331-6.ch007
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The chapter presents the results of a qualitative study using Glaser and Strauss' grounded theory design. The problem identifies the need for suitable leadership styles for application during crises in schools for unlocking high performance. Therefore, the study evaluated the viability of the transformational and transactional leadership styles as tools used by middle managers for leading during crises in schools. A sample consisting of five middle managers were used from primary and secondary schools in Jamaica, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and the Bahamas. Subsequently, the data collection process utilized primary research using semi-structured interviews. The results of the study highlighted significant evidence that high performance in schools during crises may be dependent on adaptability, promoting collaboration, and intentional accountability regimes. A limitation of the study also exposed the absence of a model for transmission of the leadership styles by middle managers in schools, and a need for future research.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The driving force behind any society is change. Kalkan et al. (2020) and Gordon et al. (2021) emphasized the necessity of individuals and organizations in employing effective leadership styles that may influence people to change and grow with the demands necessary to achieve organization-wide goals. Equally important, Nanjundeswaraswamy and Swamy (2014) asserted that a leadership style is a representation of the method adopted, to guide subordinate’s support in driving the achievement of the organization’s goals. Undoubtedly, the style itself must be carefully considered before its adaptation in practice. Subramaniam (2022) warned that the monotonous traditional autocratic leadership styles in use within some schools and organizations are no longer effective styles of leadership, especially in a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. In such instances, the organization is forced to reinvent itself due to unforeseen developments. Therefore, the versatility of the leadership style adopted in schools by middle managers must be effective.

This chapter proposes the possibility of the transformational and transactional leadership styles as solutions to the challenges many middle managers encounter in crises. As recent research such as Gigliotti (2020) and Ayyildiz and Baltaci (2020) revealed that a crisis can be portrayed as an event or occurrence that interferes or restricts the normal mode of operations within any group, micro or macro. Therefore, a crisis usually demands immediate alternative measures of operation or leadership to drive performance. On the other hand, Wisittigars and Siengthai (2019) define a crisis as any situation that is deemed unforeseen, perilous, and exudes great uncertainty that disrupts normalcy within any group. Similarly, Brinkmann et al. (2021) further add to the debate explaining a crisis as being related to happenings characterized by big data impacting leadership channels coupled with great uncertainty. Consequently, within schools, crises may impact leadership from internal occurrences and management failures: or externally resulting from uncertainties arising from the effects. Hence, the leadership and leadership styles used to charter and guide an organization’s success are crucial in alleviating the impact of crises and the achievement of targeted performance goals.

The literature has evidenced that middle managers operating within schools are faced with several difficulties in driving high performance when there is a crisis. An illustration of this can be seen in the way crises impact the personal and professional duties and responsibilities of both the middle managers and subordinates. Consequently, many challenges are brought to bear on the practice of middle managers. For example, Hulme et al. (2021) identified issues in middle management in some United Kingdom (UK) schools, such as lack of collaboration, creativity, proper support systems, and problems adapting to the fluid changes for operation to deal with the demands of a crisis situation. Similarly, a case study done in Italy by Ferri et al. (2020) also emphasized the impact of social difficulties, teaching practice challenges, and technological inadequacies compounding complications in the role of middle managers. Martinez and Broemmel (2021) further report the same challenges besetting middle managers in the United States of America (USA). Bent-Cunningham and Mauzad (2021) likewise, corroborated that middle manager, in Jamaica, were equally affected by the same difficulties identified in the UK and the USA. Finally, in the Bahamas, middle managers serving in schools have battled similar obstacles in influencing subordinates in achieving high performance targets (Miah, 2009).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Theoretical Framework: Theoretical models used to guide new research.

CPD: Relates to continuous upgrading sessions conducted to provide skills and knowledge acquisition for professionals in keeping with the current trends and practices (Maciejowska et al., 2015).

Leadership: Describes the potential of an individual to leverage other group members, and effect change relevant to goal attainment (Hao & Yazdanifard, 2015 AU73: The in-text citation "Hao & Yazdanifard, 2015" is not in the reference list. Please correct the citation, add the reference to the list, or delete the citation. ).

Leaders: Manage groups and use persuasion to drive accomplishment of assigned tasks (Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2021 ).

COVID-19 Pandemic: A novel respiratory virus with the capability to infect human cells and is highly contagious (Ciotti et al., 2020 AU72: The in-text citation "Ciotti et al., 2020" is not in the reference list. Please correct the citation, add the reference to the list, or delete the citation. ).

Social Exchange Theory: The idea that the interactions and formation of valuable connections between people is dependent on a cost-benefit judgement.

Interpretative Paradigm: Information gain from the perceptions of people residing in their experiences and cultural norms.

Middle Managers: Intermediate management level of authority with duties of both administrative and teaching roles. (Fitzgerald, 2000 AU74: The in-text citation "Fitzgerald, 2000" is not in the reference list. Please correct the citation, add the reference to the list, or delete the citation. ).

GT: Grounded Theory which refers to the research methodology that uses data collected to develop theories through the employment of comparative evaluation (Tie et al., 2019).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset