Abstract
This chapter analyzes shared leadership from a systems perspective, identifying connections with other leadership styles. The method used was the literature review. Different myths that surround shared leadership are also considered, and examples are used to illustrate how the myths can be debunked. The importance of trust is highlighted as an essential element for creating any type of relationship, including leadership, and for sharing any task. The importance of collective action and how it contributes to shared leadership is also described. Finally, different ways to overcome the myths of shared leadership are included.
TopProblem Statement
A comprehensive analysis revealed that shared leadership surpasses traditional leadership by 34% in terms of effectiveness in innovation or agile contexts (Valamis, 2023). This significant difference can be attributed to the fact that shared leadership emphasizes adaptability, which can have a greater influence on team performance when compared to conventional leadership approaches. Furthermore, shared leadership can enhance team effectiveness by fostering trust among team members through reciprocal leadership roles (Valamis, 2023).
Key Terms in this Chapter
Leadership Style: A way in which a leader performs using specific traits and skills based on specific needs and situations.
Plural: Not singular in nature, more than one.
Leadership: The ability to create meaningful relationships with others based on mutual trust.
Communication: An exchange of information to create meaning between different people.
Myth: A common belief that is not necessarily true.
Mutual: That goes in two directions, things that are held in common, something that is reciprocal.
Trust: Confidence that is placed on others because they are reliable.