Teacher Motivation and Constructivist Teaching Activities in Blended Learning Environments: The Engagement Perspective

Teacher Motivation and Constructivist Teaching Activities in Blended Learning Environments: The Engagement Perspective

Haruni J. Machumu
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-5557-6.ch001
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

University teachers' motives to engage in blended learning environments embody notable strategic aspects for knowledge construction based on individual teaching experiences and teacher education programs related to innovative hybrid pedagogy. This chapter presents blended learning teaching processes (instruction) in the context of Tanzania higher education using some data from ten higher education institutions. The chapter examines teachers' motivational factors and their engaging constructivist teaching activities in blended learning environments. Mixed methods research with exploratory research design was used to collect data from 121 teachers in six universities. The results reveal that teacher motivational factors are notable predictors of their engaging constructivist teaching activities in blended learning environments. Intrinsic motivational factor among teachers in blended learning environments is thus reinforced and suggested as university teachers aspire to enhance their engaging constructivist teaching activities.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Teachers' motives to engage in blended learning environments (BLEs) embody notable strategic aspects for knowledge construction based on one’s teaching experiences, continuous professional development and on whether one has gone through teacher education program relating to hybrid pedagogy. In addition, teacher’s educational processes in classes which are based on teaching professionalism have both positive and negative impacts on students’ learning. With the increase in investment, adoption, deployment and implementation of innovative educational technologies in higher education, teachers’ motivational factors to apply blended learning and engaging constructivist teaching activities in the blended learning environment has received considerable attention in higher education institutions (Prince, Snowden & Matthews, 2010). In this regard, this chapter presents blended learning teaching processes (instruction) in the context of Tanzania. The chapter uses some data from ten higher education institutions. The concept of blending instruction is associated with attempts to conjoin educational media and technological tools in an e-learning environment. This is to say, the traditional learning environment is enhanced with web-based learning (Derbel, 2017; Lalima, & Dangwal, 2017).

It is an innovative teaching and learning approach that embraces the advantages of both traditional teaching and learning and the ICT mediated instruction including offline and online learning (Machumu & Zhu, 2017). Application of blended learning in Tanzania commenced in the 2000s because of a number of factors, namely; economy, technological changes, pedagogical approaches, working environments. It should be noted that the current development and increasing use of blended learning environments in Tanzania education systems are because of influence of innovative digital instructional technologies and the failure of traditional learning to meet students’ expectations (Mtebe & Raphael, 2017). In such learning environments, two instructional approaches are conjoined in order that learning theory, teaching methods, learning assessments, instructional design, and practices yield the best academic outcomes. In the context of Tanzania, most of e-learning solutions and services are perceived as transformative learning. Transformative learning is a philosophy of teaching and learning which intend to challenge students' thinking and teachers' ability to employ innovative solutions like blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning for their daily undertakings.

Students are then encouraged to use critical thinking skills and deep questioning skills to understand whether or not their underlying concepts, ideas, assumptions and beliefs about the world are accurate and change their conceptions accordingly (Christie, Carey, Robertson, & Grainger, 2015). This kind of learning allows flexibility by exploiting students' experiences in learning which lead to change. Transformative learning is about developing leadership attributes; its purpose is to produce enlightened change agents who capitalise on available and accessible learning facilities to produce desired outcomes (Umemoto & Tanaka, 2017; Fleming, 2018).

Blended learning environments are similar to transformative learning in challenging student thinking. It involves conjoining learning modes, online and traditional face-to-face learning. In the online mode, learners experience personalised learning by engaging on free dialogue, critical debate, negotiation and agreement while in the conventional face-to-face learning mode learners experience how to react in real-time and be assertive (Bele & Rugelj, 2007). In the context of Tanzania higher education institutions, a number of institutions deployed blended learning courses which offered the possibility of having access to the teacher via online coaching and learning management platforms. As such, well-formulated, planned, organised and supported blended learning environments not only encourage the conduct of meaningful learning but also motivate both teachers and students' engagement through different learning strategies. Engaging constructivist teaching activities encourage and reinforce collaboration, guided discovery and interactive inquiry, as opposed to rote learning, passive learning or some traditional face-to-face learning.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Engaging Constructivist Teaching: An established and formalized philosophy about teachers’ degree of involvement and commitment in fulfilling authentic teaching and learning activities or tasks.

Teacher Motivation: A distinguished reasons emanating from individual teachers’ interest and values to engage in teaching, sustaining teaching and internal or external desire to engagement with the teaching profession as indicated and influenced by contextual factors.

Blended Learning: A formalized and well-organised with institutional combinations of online and conventional teaching and learning approaches that yield authentic teaching and learning.

Blended Learning Environments: A dignified teaching and learning environments that encourage sharing fruitful discussion and both online and traditional face-to-face learning experiences.

Motivation: Individual internal or external stimulating desires or behaviour to engage and accomplish specific goals in context.

Authentic Learning Activity: A type of learning that involve providing students with tasks reflecting the real-world life and can be applied in their long-life learning and working.

Amotivation: A provisional state (emotion) of inability or refusal of an individual to engage in a specific activity, event or behaviour caused by prolonged or substandard conditions.

Constructivist Teaching Activity: An organised responsibility performed by a teacher to influence students’ knowledge construction based on prior and shared learning experiences.

Teacher Engagement: Refers to physical, emotional, and cognitive involvement in specified event, activity, or tasks with expected outcomes.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset