Web-Enhanced Computer Science Course: College Students' Experiences

Web-Enhanced Computer Science Course: College Students' Experiences

Hoda Baytiyeh, Shady Elbassuoni
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa2
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Information and communication technologies have changed the way students learn, and higher education institutions in the Middle East region strive to attract professors who use technology in their daily teaching and learning practices. This study examines students’ experiences of a Web-enhanced computer science course. In an online survey based on the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) model, 132 students’ responses to 31 items were measured and analyzed. Factor analysis revealed three pre-dominated factors: technology, pedagogy-content and TPACK; of these, technology was found to exert the strongest influence on students’ educational experiences. The findings are discussed in relation to the TPACK model, along with implications for theory and practice. This investigation provides insights into current initiatives in the Middle East region that encourage higher education institutions to implement technology in teaching and learning. It contributes to the literature by deepening understanding of how new approaches in education are diffused and adopted.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The integration of technological tools and applications in the classroom has become an essential component of education reform. In these circumstances, professors in higher education institutions are encouraged to develop their digital literacy and adopt relevant technologies for their own professional development and, crucially, to engage effectively with the digital generation of students.

Implementing technology in the STEM fields has proved effective both for instructors’ teaching and students’ learning. As well as improving instructors' attitude and confidence (Sorensen, Twidle, Childs, & Godwin, 2007), using technology enhances creative reflection on scientific concepts (Baytiyeh & Naja, 2017; Jang, 2009; La Velle, McFarlane, & Brawn, 2003; Rodrigues, Marks, & Steel, 2003). From the student’s perspective, the use of technology promotes constructive reasoning in scientific investigations and helps to connect learning to practical work (Baytiyeh, 2017; McFarlane & Sakellariou, 2002).

Researchers in Europe and the US have urged higher education institutions to provide academics with the necessary training and support to integrate technology into their daily teaching practices and to understand the relationship between technology, pedagogy and subject matter content(Ebert-May et al., 2011; Rienties et al., 2012; Stes et al., 2012).

In the Middle East, initiatives to adopt technology in teaching and learning in higher education institutions remain tentative, and few universities have adopted electronic learning (e-learning). Among the barriers to e-learning in the region, it is commonly assumed that Internet penetration is low, with poor quality connectivity, and there is a fear that Web content will promote immoral values among young people (Al-Kahtani, Ryan, & Jefferson, 2006; Mirza, 1998). Additionally, governments’ failure to specify quality standards for blended and online programs has led to a loss of credibility in relation to such degrees. The consequent lack of recognition of e-learning has discouraged academic institutions from offering blended and online programs (Dirani & Yoon, 2009).

As one example, the American University of Beirut (AUB), Lebanese American University and American University in Cairo (AUC) launched a joint professional postgraduate diploma in green technologies in the spring of 2015. The program offered three specializations: renewable energies, green buildings and water resources (Baytiyeh, 2018). The ultimate goal was to offer this program in countries and universities across the region, so enabling engineering and architecture professionals to enhance or complement their technical and decision-making skills in relation to green technologies. Although the program has proved successful, it is still regarded only as a professional diploma recognized by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education in the United States and remains unaccredited by any of the higher education bodies in the hosting countries.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 3 Issues (2022)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing