University Student Use and Perception of Listening Comprehension Strategies: The Case of Online EMI Lectures

University Student Use and Perception of Listening Comprehension Strategies: The Case of Online EMI Lectures

Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs, Ahmed Masrai, Noorchaya Yahya
DOI: 10.4018/IJCALLT.291114
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The current study aimed to explore undergraduate students use and perceptions of listening comprehension strategies (LCS) in online EMI lectures, and the extent to which LCS use depends on the students’ general language proficiency and language exposure. A total of 76 English majors completed a language proficiency test, an LCS inventory and a language exposure survey. Additionally, 60 of the participants answered 8 open-ended questions on their perceptions of LCS in online EMI lectures. The results of this mixed-methods approach showed that students used a wide variety of metacognitive, cognitive and socio-affective strategies to comprehend online EMI lectures. The students also seemed aware of the particularly challenging nature of online EMI lectures, and thus took several measures before, during and after class to facilitate comprehension. Additionally, the results showed that the students’ choice of LCS is partially dependent on their English language proficiency and exposure.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Several studies have attempted to examine the listening difficulties English language learners struggle with. For example, Wang and Fan (2015) examined the listening difficulties faced by low-proficiency Chinese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). Results from a 38-item questionnaire and semi-structured interviews revealed that the teachers and learners shared the view that bottom-up processing difficulties, such as decoding and word recognition, represent the most serious challenge for the low-level EFL learners. Hence, the authors recommended helping low-proficiency EFL learners to overcome their bottom-up processing difficulties before encouraging them to use more top-down processing strategies.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 5 Issues (2022)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing