Students' Acceptance of an Educational Videos Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University

Students' Acceptance of an Educational Videos Platform: A Study in a Portuguese University

Carolina Costa, Helena Alvelos, Leonor Teixeira
DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2018010107
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The Educast is an educational videos' platform that captures simultaneously video and digital support materials. This paper presents a study on the acceptance of Educast, by students, using the Technology Acceptance Model–TAM. The data was collected through a questionnaire applied to 54 students which results were analyzed using descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests. It was concluded that students expressed a positive attitude towards the variables Perceived Ease Of Use, Perceived Usefulness and Attitude Toward Using. The comparison between ratings assigned to the questionnaire items by the students who viewed video recordings and those that did not was performed, and it was found that the former showed higher levels of agreement with the referred items than the latter. It is considered that introducing some training before students have contact with Educast should be taken into account. The result of this work can be valuable not only for researchers on the Education area, but also for teachers that intend to use educational videos in their teaching/learning environment.
Article Preview
Top

2. Models Of Technologies Acceptance Evaluation

There are several models that explain the acceptance of technology by the users, being the TAM one of the most used (Sharma, Joshi, & Sharma, 2016). This model is based on the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), in which the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is also based. More recently, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was developed based on 8 models, including the TRA and the TAM (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003).

2.1. Theory of Reasoned Action

The TRA model was introduced by Fishbein and Ajzen in 1975, being widely used in social psychology, when the determinants of behavior (Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989) are concerned. This model is a very general model and should be adapted when the objective is to study the determinants of the computer technology’s use behavior (Davis et al., 1989). It consists of the variables (1) Actual Behavior, (2) Behavioral Intention, (3) Attitude Toward Behavior, (4) Subjective Norm, (5) Beliefs and Evaluations, and (6) Normative Beliefs and Motivation to Comply. The behavior of the user (Actual Behavior) is determined by the Behavioral Intention, which in turn is influenced by the Attitude Toward Behavior and the Subjective Norm. The Attitude Toward Behavior is influenced by the Beliefs and Evaluations, and the Subjective Norm by Normative Beliefs and Motivation to Comply (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

TRA model (Davis et al., 1989)

IJICTE.2018010107.f01

According to Tan and Ramayah (2014), this model has been effectively applied in numerous studies in areas like knowledge management, medical studies, social psychology and information technology adoption.

2.2. Theory of Planned Behavior

The TPB model is a theory that explains individual behavior and was developed based on the TRA. This theory suggests that individual behavior is driven by intention that depends on three factors: (1) Attitude Toward the Behavior, (2) Subjective Norms, and (3) Perceived Behavioral Control, which, in turn, influence each other (Ajzen, 1991) (see Figure 2).

Figure 2.

TPB model (Ajzen, 1991)

IJICTE.2018010107.f02

The TPB has been applied in various contexts including technology (Davis, 1989, Chang, 1998), and specifically applied to the use of mobile devices in higher education (Cheon, Lee, Crooks, & Song, 2012).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 3 Issues (2022)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing