Mining Self-Defined Business Process in Electronic Administration

Mining Self-Defined Business Process in Electronic Administration

Zineb Lamghari, Rajaa Saidi, Maryam Radgui, Moulay Driss Rahmani
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/IJESMA.296572
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The information retrieval system is a set of resources and tools that allow users to search for information in a given domain. This system permits users to perform their research according to their objectives in diverse ways producing different behaviors. Even users with the same objective may follow different paths and stand different sub-processes, which are introduced as self-defined Business Processes that vary in terms of structure, objective, and result. This puts forward the difficulty of obtaining and studying these user’s behaviors. This paper targets the problem of representing and managing self-defined business process variability. A special interest is given to the use of process mining to deal with this challenge. In this regard, a case study about citizens in interaction with the Electronic Administration is presented, to discover and manage variability of this process type. The main result is a set of recommendations to end users.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Information Retrieval (IR) System (Naouar et al., 2017a; Naouar et al., 2017b) is a set of resources and tools that allow users to search for information in a given domain. These systems permit users to accomplish their research according to their objectives. In this sense, processes provided by the IR systems allow users often to determine their own procedure. In such context, the user's manner to perform a task (purchasing a product from an e-commerce website, searching for a document in a digital library, etc.) represents a “self-defined process” (Luengo & Sepúlveda, 2011). Among these systems that produce the self-defined BP type, there is the case of digital libraries (Shiri, 2018), e-commerce websites (Laudon & Traver, 2016), cyber-physical systems (Seiger et al., 2019), Electronic administration services (Kasprzyk, 2018), and others.

Self-defined BPs are considered as a special category of BPs, with high variability level (Cole, 2015; Dinh & Tamine, 2015). This category of BPs represents user’s behaviors that may achieve one objective in diverse ways to perform a research. Indeed, users in information-seeking situations adopt behaviors that depend on many factors (Naouar et al., 2017b; Ruso et al., 2013; Laudon et al., 2016), that can change user’s processes. These factors are: 1. User’s objective. 2. User’s Requirement and 3. Engine’s Knowledge used to search the information.

Therefore, the difficulty of representing self-defined BP emerges from its variability (Athukorala et al., 2015; Luengo & Sepúlveda, 2011). The later changes according to different contexts and requirement. Even though managing process variability is a non-trivial task because it requires specific standards, methods, and technologies, it still involves many parameters that are not always formally defined. For example, designing the reference process model, which represent the commonalities from the process family, is a challenge, as well as the necessary adjustments to configure a specific process variant.

To overcome these challenges, it would be useful to represent users’ behavior (information-seeking processes), i.e., to define the generic process model, in order to study the self-defined BP variability and recommend the suitable path to each user. Also, it is useful to manage the process variants through ontologies based on semantic reasoning and Configurable Process Model (CPM) (Gottschalk et al., 2007), i.e., to select the appropriate process variant according to the combination between different self-defined BP ontologies.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing