Learning to Evaluate Through That-Clauses: Insights From a Longitudinal Corpus Study of Bruneian Students' Writing

Learning to Evaluate Through That-Clauses: Insights From a Longitudinal Corpus Study of Bruneian Students' Writing

Deliang Man, Kok Yueh Lee, Meng Huat Chau, Esther Smidt
DOI: 10.4018/IJCALLT.2021040106
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The advent of technology has facilitated the study of language development and writing development in the form of learner corpora. While learner corpus studies have flourished in recent years, few consider evaluative language development. This paper reports on a study which examines the use of evaluative that-clauses, a linguistic structure that is regularly used to express evaluation in academic writing, in a longitudinal corpus of 304 argumentative essays written by a group of undergraduate students at a university in Brunei. Results suggest students' dynamic use of language resources over time, and support the findings of previous research on the use of evaluative that-clauses by undergraduate students in other contexts of learning. This study, based on an approach to treating learner language in its own right, contributes to the understanding of the nature of language development. Implications for language teaching, including a revised role for teacher feedback and the use of longitudinal learner corpora for students' learning, are considered.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

An evaluative that-clause consists of two components: one is a proposition and the other a stance towards that proposition, as illustrated in the following examples from our corpus:

  • 1. It is expected [Evaluative stance] that the Internet can help students in broadening their knowledge [Evaluative entity]. (58a)

  • Many have argued [Evaluative stance] that the internet brings more harm than good to students [Evaluative entity]. (70b)

  • It is evident [Evaluative stance] that internet brings more harm than good to students [Evaluative entity]. (60c)

This grammatical structure has considerable evaluative potential (see, e.g., Hyland & Tse, 2005a, 2005b). The that-clause can be introduced by a range of predicates (e.g., a verb, a noun or an adjective), which convey specific evaluative meanings. Additionally, this grammatical structure allows the writer to manage the source of evaluation by extraposing the grammatical subject to the position following the original predicate or concealing the grammatical subject. Consider this example:

  • 2. Many have arguedthat the internet brings more harm than good to students. (70b)

The evaluative that-clause above can be paraphrased as: “It is argued by many that …” to extrapose the subject, or paraphrased as “It is argued that ...” to conceal the subject.

Manipulation of the grammatical subject allows writers to attribute the stance in an explicit, implicit or ambiguous manner. Many stance markers are explicitly attributed, illustrated as follows:

  • 3. I am of the opinionthat the benefits of the Internet far outweigh the opposite. (26a).

  • Many have arguedthat the internet have more drawbacks than benefits when it comes to students. (70a)

  • We are certainly surethat I will mind I’m not thinking straight. (75a).

Others express stance without identifying the writer. In some cases, the attribution of stance is not explicit but can still be inferred as that of the writer.

  • 4. It might be truethat internet brings more harm compared to good to students. (04a)

  • It is evidentthat the internet has a big role in our everyday life nowadays. (42a)

  • It is unfortunatethat students face these issues but there are ways to help them. (80a)

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 5 Issues (2022)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing