Knowledge Transfer from Expert Systems vs. Traditional Instruction: Do Personality Traits Make a Difference?

Knowledge Transfer from Expert Systems vs. Traditional Instruction: Do Personality Traits Make a Difference?

Marcus D. Odom, Hamid Pourjalali
Copyright: © 1996 |Pages: 7
DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.1996040102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The recent interest in the development and use of expert systems and computer-assisted instruction as pedagogical tools has resulted in a need for research into the effectiveness of such instructional methods. This study reports on the extension of an experiment in which one of three teaching methods, (instruction, expert system, or a combination of the two), were used to teach a subject domain (Odom and Murphy, 1992). The personality traits of the individual subjects, measured using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, affect on knowledge development, both separately and in cohort with a teaching method were examined. The development of both declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge of the subjects was measured. The findings demonstrate that both methods of instruction and personality traits do affect the development of declarative and procedural knowledge. The development of declarative knowledge was significantly affected by teaching method and one personality trait, thinking/feeling, as well as by the interaction of the two. The results for the procedural knowledge also show a significant main effect for teaching methods and for one personality trait, sensing/intuitive. The interaction of these two was also significant.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing