Investigating L2 Grammatical Accuracy in Digital Multimodal Writing

Investigating L2 Grammatical Accuracy in Digital Multimodal Writing

Assim S. Alrajhi
DOI: 10.4018/IJCALLT.338399
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This study examines and compares L2 grammatical accuracy in digital multimodal writing (DMW) and monomodal text-based writing (TBW). Utilizing a mixed-methods design, the research incorporates a dataset comprising 180 written texts, a questionnaire, and text-based interviews. Sixty EFL learners were assigned to two groups (TBW and DMW) and completed three writing tasks on identical topics. The findings reveal that there are no significant differences in grammatical accuracy between TBW and DMW. Moreover, learners' perceptions indicate that the integration of multi-semiotic recourses has no detrimental effect on grammatical accuracy. Additionally, learners adopted a preferred recursive strategy, involving text writing followed by integrating nonlinguistic components to complete and revise their DMW compositions. Consequently, two factors emerge as crucial in elucidating the comparable level of grammatical accuracy in DMW and TBW: (1) active engagement in each linguistic and nonlinguistic component, and (2) an awareness of the essentiality of the text component, necessitating the prioritization of the linguistic resource or the deliberate separation of text writing from other components within the DMW process. This study concludes with pedagogical implications and suggestions for further research.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

The Concepts of Multimodal Composition and Multimodality

In the field of composition, a conundrum is observed in relation to defining multimodality-based writing (Prior, 2017). Several definitions, however, elucidating the concepts of multimodality and multimodal composition (MC) have been proposed in the literature. One such definition, put forth by Bowen and Whithaus (2013), characterizes MC as “the conscious manipulation of the interaction among various sensory experiences—visual, textual, verbal, tactile, and aural—used in the processes of producing…texts” (p. 7). In terms of multimodality and modes, Kress and van Leeuwen (2001) define the former as the “use of several semiotic modes in the design of a semiotic product or event” and the latter as “ways of representing information or the semiotic channels we use to compose a text” (pp. 20–22). Thus, these modes can manifest in different forms, such as linguistic, visual, spatial, aural, and gestural.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 5 Issues (2022)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing