Designing Group Tasks in Online Task-Based Language Teaching Environments: A Systematic Review

Designing Group Tasks in Online Task-Based Language Teaching Environments: A Systematic Review

Zilu Jiang, Babatunde Akinkuolie, Lizeng Huang, Kui Xie
DOI: 10.4018/IJCALLT.315305
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The design of online task-based language learning (TBLT) tasks encompasses the design of activity, settings, procedures, and participants. Previous empirical studies have conducted an extensive investigation on each design factor; however, an effective design of the online environment is built upon the interplay between the consideration of task types, online learning modalities, task implementation, and the participant background. A systematic review is needed to examine the potential synergistic effects of task design factors on students' online language learning experiences. The study investigated the current trends in the design of group TBLT task types in online settings and how task types and design features (modalities, participants, and task implementation) jointly influenced the language learning experience. The analysis revealed eight popular task types and synthesized how the design features affect language learning engagement and performance. The authors further discussed implications for future online TBLT task design and research.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Group Tasks in Online Environment

Task types have been found to play an influential role in learner interaction in the online language learning environment. A TBLT task should have a clearly defined outcome, some gaps of information, and resemble communication in the real-world (Ellis, 2009; González-Lloret & Ortega, 2014). Pica et al.'s (1993) typology of tasks has been widely adopted in research, including jigsaw, information gap, problem-solving, decision-making, and opinion exchange. However, conflict findings are presented in the literature. Blake (2000) found that jigsaw tasks in online text-based communication elicited more negotiation of meaning than information-gap and decision-making tasks. However, Smith (2003) pointed out that decision-making tasks produced more negotiation episodes than jigsaws when considering target lexical items. Along the same line, Pellettieri (2000) indicated that jigsaw tasks elicited fewer negotiations than information-gap tasks in a synchronous discussion. Moreover, Yilmaz and Granena (2010) found that dictogloss tasks were more effective than jigsaw tasks in producing language-related episodes in text-based communication. These conflict findings showed that task effects might vary in different contexts. It underscored the need to further examine factors that influence communication, such as the technologies used. Without further investigating the task conditions and process, researchers would only attain a vague understanding of online task implementation (Yilmaz, 2011).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 12: 5 Issues (2022)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2011)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing