Strengthening an Organizational Knowledge-Sharing Culture

Strengthening an Organizational Knowledge-Sharing Culture

Jens Degn-Andersen
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-7422-5.ch013
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

To improve knowledge sharing at the video game company Ubisoft, the knowledge management team investigated the key elements comprising a knowledge sharing culture. A knowledge sharing culture circle outlining both enablers and barriers to effective knowledge sharing is constructed. The five enablers—the nature of knowledge, opportunities to share, motivation to share, the culture and work environment, and trust—should be supported to strengthen knowledge sharing. At the same time, the barriers hindering efficient knowledge sharing at Ubisoft—confidentiality, knowledge hoarding, competition, and lack of prioritization—must be addressed to leverage the benefits of shared knowledge. The interconnected nature of both the enablers and the barriers must be taken into account when constructing initiatives intended to strengthen a culture of knowledge sharing. Five initiatives are described: a new content management paradigm, strengthened internal job communities, redefined internal security policies, objectives and key results on knowledge sharing, and targeted training.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

Knowledge Sharing Issues at Ubisoft

The Ubisoft KM team's mission is to enable employees to leverage content and knowledge so they can perform at their best. To do so, the KM team delivers company-wide solutions and programs intended to facilitate internal collaboration and knowledge reuse, for example, via internal social networks, documentation ecosystems, governance policies, enterprise search, and more.

More often than not, the KM team has witnessed that while the services and solutions delivered were of a high standard, they did not have the intended impact. In the past, the KM team has developed documentation ecosystems for new production teams. Six months later, when the KM team checked in, the ecosystem would be one big mess with duplicate content, no structure, essential knowledge missing, low user satisfaction, and a limited amount of sharing taking place.

Other relatively common examples of an inadequate knowledge sharing culture have been witnessed when teams decline to document or share their knowledge with other teams. Or when teams prefer starting from scratch by developing their own assets or knowledge, either because another team refused to share, because the team is more comfortable doing everything themselves, because it is too complicated, or just impossible to get access to the knowledge.

A global enterprise-wide survey is sent out every second year to all employees at Ubisoft. Some questions in the survey centers around collaboration, communication, and information sharing. Answers to these questions illustrate that employees highlight issues with lack of sharing, insufficient documentation, and silos between production teams as problematic. The same conclusions are drawn from user interviews and smaller KM surveys: Employees recognize the issues with knowledge sharing, but they either cannot or will not take the responsibility to improve it on their own.

Conclusions of a master thesis (Rose, 2012) on what influences knowledge sharing at Ubisoft showed that the identified barriers also existed almost ten years back. That indicates that some issues are deeply rooted in the Ubisoft culture and should be addressed if anything should change. In the “Main barriers to knowledge sharing at Ubisoft” section, examples and reasons for the most dominant barriers at Ubisoft will be detailed.

With all of this, it can be determined that great customized tools and well-defined content strategies do not have the expected impact, and KM services and solutions will never live up to their full potential. The KM team has realized that what is needed is an underlying culture that supports more and better knowledge sharing at Ubisoft. For that reason, the ambitious goal of strengthening a knowledge sharing culture has started at Ubisoft.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Knowledge Sharing: A mutual formal or informal exchange of ideas among individuals or groups.

Knowledge Sharing Culture Circle: A model illustrating five enablers that are perceived as necessary for knowledge sharing to happen in an organization.

Knowledge Sharing Enablers: Factors that can facilitate or contribute to effective knowledge sharing in an organization. The five enablers are: the nature of knowledge, opportunities to share, motivation to share, the culture and work environment, and trust.

Knowledge Sharing Initiatives: Concrete actions based on the enablers of knowledge sharing that are intended to help overcome knowledge sharing barriers.

New Content Management Paradigm: Ubisoft’s vision to organize internal knowledge in ways that are better supported by the knowledge sharing enablers and will break down internal silos.

Knowledge Sharing Barriers: Anything that hinders or impedes efficient knowledge sharing. At Ubisoft the barriers identified are security, knowledge hoarding, competition, and lack of prioritization.

Trust: A prerequisite for knowledge sharing to take place. Trust can be categorized as one of two types, integrity and ability based, and is about the willingness to be vulnerable to the actions of another party based on the expectations that they will deliver something important or of value.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset