Social Innovation and Cultural Tourism: A Review of Co-Creation Strategies for Sustainable Tourism

Social Innovation and Cultural Tourism: A Review of Co-Creation Strategies for Sustainable Tourism

Maria D. Pitarch-Garrido
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 16
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9217-5.ch001
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The main objective of this chapter is to explain and understand how the enhancement of culture for the development of tourism is approached through processes of social innovation as a new form of social action that is capable of transforming the frameworks of action and proposing new formulas for the development of cultural tourist destinations. Initiatives classified as social innovation are characterised by mobilising local and external resources to change the logic of collective action and provide new responses to common problems. It is based on citizen participation, shared leadership, co-creation of knowledge, initiatives, and policies. Cultural heritage is understood in this way as linked to the society that generated it, maintains it, and gives it its own identity. The tourist using this heritage must favour its conservation and sustainability. This chapter aims to review the literature concerning social innovation in tourism and good practices in order to generate a theoretical basis so that the social innovation processes already validated can be replicated in other countries.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Culture and heritage are part of the essence of every human group. However, neither one nor the other has always been equally valued by society, which leads to problems for their conservation, for their transmission to future generations and for their enhancement through activities such as tourism. In more recent history, the value of culture and heritage has almost always been granted, or at least ratified, by governmental bodies at different levels. The consolidation of a certain approach that we can call “top-down” makes the identification of the population with its history, its culture, and therefore its heritage, less efficient. Local governance processes have not always considered culture as one of its objectives, so it has not always been correctly used for the development of local societies.

The author understands social innovation from a territorial orientation, i.e., as new social, organisational or institutional arrangements or configurations established to modify social relations, to transform a framework of action or to propose new cultural orientations in a territory (Klein et al., 2009; Lévesque, Fontan & Klein, 2014; Klein & Pitarch, 2020). The territorial development process is stronger if it is the product of an innovative process that involves the local population and all internal and external stakeholders with an interest in the territory. “Bottom-up” development, based on participation and dialogue between citizens and between institutions, the enhancement of endogenous and exogenous resources, as well as the consolidation of shared leadership and the co-construction of knowledge that allows for seeing emerging development options, generate a more solid social capital, positive synergies between different sectors and sustainable and integrated development.

The concept of social innovation is closely related to notions such as solution and transformation, which ultimately means policy and practice with the capacity to influence action for a new, fairer, sustainable and ultimately free and responsible society (Pitarch-Garrido et al., 2019). In terms of tourism, it is especially important to guarantee an attractive, authentic and respectful experience for tourists, which is increasingly demanded and valued.

Today, the notion of cultural heritage refers to all assets, whether man-made or natural, tangible or intangible, without limit of time or place, collected or inherited by previous generations and preserved for transmission to future generations. It is noteworthy that it emphasises the value given by the subject within a community (which links it directly to the aspects of social innovation mentioned above), as an integral part of a social group that appropriates the elements that form part of its culture and history, but from the present moment on. This is a new categorisation of heritage as memory and the importance of cultural diversity as an unequivocal notion associated with it (Alba-Pagán & Pitarch-Garrido, 2018).

Social innovation, and the consequent co-creation process, makes the heritage and culture of each territory available for the creation of value and facilitates new business opportunities and novel concepts, especially in tourism. Some of its results have great indirect potential. An innovation process from the grassroots, from society, can offer new ideas, which are especially useful for the creation of future tourism products and services linked to heritage and local resources.

For the tourism industry, tools and content co-created through so-called social innovation processes, with a bottom-up perspective, are fundamental in adding value to the world's tourism destinations. This is important because the current crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has irreparably affected the tourism sector, making it less competitive, globally and locally.

The tourists of the future will be more informed and specialised (Kuzior, et al., 2021; Wachyuni & Kusumaningrum, 2020). They will be looking for unique experiences, or at least experiences that cannot be easily replicated elsewhere. Cultural tourism is unique to each territory or destination and is capable of attracting a more informed, interested and spending tourist. In areas with competitiveness problems, and with an interesting heritage, tourism is the engine of development. However, there is also the danger of overstepping the limits and breaking the difficult balance between profit and saturation, which is why control, sustainability and local citizen initiative guarantee an adequate enhancement of heritage for visitors. Sustainability is, then, a key concept (Kuzior, et al., 2021; Ribes & Baidal, 2018).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Social Innovation: New social, organizational, or institutional arrangements or configurations established to modify social relations, to transform a framework of action or to propose new cultural orientations in a territory.

Tourism Stakeholders: Social actors who have an interest in tourism activities or in the impacts generated by tourism.

Community-Based Tourism: The set of tourism activities generated and managed by the local community, of endogenous origin, and whose benefits accrue to the territory in which it is generated. It is always linked to local tourism resources, both natural and cultural.

Cultural Heritage: This term refers to all assets, whether man-made or natural, tangible or intangible, without limit of time or place, collected or inherited by previous generations and preserved for transmission to future generations.

Co-Creation: Process by which agreements or consensus are reached to make decisions that have an impact on society as a whole or on a specific group.

Sustainable Tourism: Tourism that takes full account of current and future economic, social and environmental impacts to meet the needs of visitors, industry, the environment and host communities.

Innovative Tourism Ecosystem: Social, economic, and environmental context, generally linked to a territory, that contributes positively to generating and consolidating innovative tourism initiatives from which, in turn, they benefit positively. This ecosystem includes a solid relational social capital, a highly qualified population, a mature democratic and participatory culture, and adequate regulation (legislation) to promote sustainable tourism and participatory governance.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset