New Teachers Thrive With Induction Support Through the Phases of a First Year Teacher

New Teachers Thrive With Induction Support Through the Phases of a First Year Teacher

Chris Wilcoxen, Amanda Steiner, Julie Bell
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-3848-0.ch015
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Teacher attrition and support for novice teachers are impacted by quality induction programs. Induction programs provide support to beginning teachers through a job-embedded system of guidance and professional learning. Whereas Moir's phases of a first-year teacher framework outlined beginning teachers' developmental needs as a linear progression, the authors argue it is a dynamic process that occurs throughout the year. When new teachers are supported through these transitions with strategic mentoring and coaching practices, the transitions have less of a negative impact. Authors outline mentoring and coaching strategies to use during typical induction and crises to support beginning teachers in developing both resilience and self-efficacy.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

One of the major problems facing education today is teacher attrition and retention. In 2009, 30% of American teachers left the profession within the first 5 years (Darling-Hammond, 2009); by 2017, this rate had increased to over 50% (Papay et al., 2017). The rate has remained over 50%, including 8% of teachers who are not replaced (Carver-Thomas & Darling-Hammond, 2019). Teachers leaving the profession report feelings of isolation and lack of support from administration (Ingersoll et al., 2014; Nehmeh & Kelly, 2018). Scholars project the attrition rate will be even more negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic (Olson Stewart et al., 2021). In addition to the pandemic, beginning teachers are entering the field after interrupted experiences as pre-service teachers, and veteran teachers are retiring at an accelerated rate (Ingersoll et al., 2018). As a result, schools are forced to turn to inexperienced or unqualified teachers and increased class sizes to accommodate (Rich et al., 2020; Sutcher et al., 2019). Additionally, the cost to replace a single teacher in an urban district can be up to $20,000 (Podolsky et al., 2017).

Both teacher retention and attrition are positively impacted by quality induction programs. Induction programs provide support to beginning teachers through job-embedded systems of guidance and professional learning that begin in teachers’ first years in the classroom. Beginning teacher induction, when effective, has many of the same benefits as teacher collaboration, including teacher retention (Charner-Laird et al., 2016; Hong & Matsko, 2019), instructional improvement (Martin et al., 2015), and increased student achievement (Stapp et al., 2019). Induction programs work to retain novice teachers, enhance teachers’ skill sets, and improve student learning (Ingersoll, 2012). Support from induction mitigates teacher attrition and helps beginning teachers build a repertoire of skills and strategies they can use in their classrooms (Stapp et al., 2019) and throughout their careers.

Teachers do not learn best from outside experts or attending conferences. Teachers learn best from other teachers, in settings where they can collaborate across time to construct meaning of their classroom experiences with the support of a non-evaluative mentor or coach (Olson Stewart et al., 2021). An induction program with mentors and/or coaches who value beginning teachers’ voices (Stanulis & Bell, 2017) and treat teachers as individuals (Sowell, 2017) is key to developing teachers’ instructional practice, efficacy, and capacity for leadership. Educators grow in stages throughout their careers, and quality induction programs help beginning teachers thrive early in their careers.

Although increasing across the United States, induction looks different in varying contexts (Gardiner & Weisling, 2018; Kwok, 2018; Olson Stewart et al., 2021). For example, there are high-intensity and low-intensity programs that use a variety of both mentoring and coaching formats. Researchers evaluating the effectiveness of induction programs compared high-intensity activities such as mentoring and coaching, networking, group discussions, and problem solving to low-intensity activities such as school orientations, emotional support, and information sharing (Dishena & Mokoena, 2016; Moore & Swan, 2008). High-intensity activities, as opposed to low intensity activities, positively impacted teacher effectiveness (Dishena & Mokoena, 2016; Moore & Swan, 2008). Additionally, as Kwok and colleagues (2021) stated, “Induction programs should prioritize the novice teachers and their experiences to help improve their pedagogical development” (p.188). The induction program described in this chapter works to develop resilience in the profession and self-efficacy in beginning teachers by valuing teacher autonomy, engaging in high-intensity coaching and mentoring practices, and individualizing induction based on the phases of the first year teacher (Moir, 1999).

Key Terms in this Chapter

New/Beginning Teacher: A teacher in their first or second year of full-time teaching.

Educative Mentoring: Based on Dewey’s (1933) AU63: The in-text citation "Dewey’s (1933)" is not in the reference list. Please correct the citation, add the reference to the list, or delete the citation. term educative , Feiman-Nemser (2001) developed the concept of educative mentoring: Mentoring that is growth-producing, focused on student learning, and directed by the new/beginning teacher.

CADRE Associate: CADRE Associates are veteran classroom teachers selected by their respective districts. They assume alternative responsibilities for the year that include mentoring and coaching CADRE Teachers, district-designated roles, and university-related work.

High-Intensity Induction: Based on Dishena and Mokoena’s (2016) concept of high-intensity induction, high-intensity induction practices include mentoring and coaching, group discussions, networking, and problem solving, among others.

Resilience: Based on Nehmeh and Kelly’s (2018) work, resilience refers to an individual’s ability to adapt or overcome challenging or adverse situations.

Crisis: Pedagogical, or learning, opportunity based on a challenging situation that individuals may perceive as stressful that requires special coping mechanisms. To learn from crisis, individuals must engage in reflection and action ( Houwer, 2011 ).

Career Advancement and Development of Recruits and Experienced Teachers (CADRE) Project: The CADRE Project is designed to assist newly certified CADRE Teachers with challenges unique to entry into the profession of education. CADRE Teachers complete a year-long teaching assignment and a specialized master’s degree program of study.

Coaching: On-site professional development provided to teachers that prompts reflection on practice to promote teacher and learner growth. The work of the coach can be vast and varied (e.g., instructional coach, cognitive coach, literacy coach, data coach, etc.).

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset