Learning Processes in Impact Communities: Different Variables to Consider

Learning Processes in Impact Communities: Different Variables to Consider

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5867-5.ch002
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Engagement processes are facing a lot of challenges since the boom of the IT. This is true when there is a face-to-face engagement process, but also when the ties are mostly virtual. Nowadays, access to social networks, platforms for content posting and sharing (blogs, wikis, etc.), and for collaborative work are changing the way people engage. Those tools have enriched the processes, but also initiated new challenges. Knowledge sharing and transfer are processes that occur when several factors are combined. One of them, and the most important, is the existence of human critical mass capable of thinking the world and finding ways of changing it for the better, in this specific case social entrepreneurship. The authors studied a pilot of an impact community, its path, and the challenges it has faced. They also implemented four interviews to specialists in the areas of networks, social entrepreneurship, and learning.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Social Entrepreneurship in Portugal has suffered a positive evolution over the past few years. CASES (Cooperativa António Sérgio para a Economia Social) has shown that, in 2010, Social Economy represented a 2.8% of the Portuguese gross value added, 5.5% of the paid employment and 4.7% of total employment. Moreover, there were more than 55000 organizations from the social sector which had a result of 41.3% of the Portuguese gross value added and 40.6% of total employment (INE, CASES, 2013).

These data confirm the Social Economy and Social Entrepreneurship importance for the Country development, with the prediction of growing in the next years. And as Social Entrepreneurship is highlighted, it is easily understood that it’s important to be aware of its many critical success factors. Two of them are going to be discussed in this paper: cooperation and sharing. It’s our belief that these two dimensions largely contribute for knowledge creation, learnings dissemination and territorial development.

At this point it is important to analyze how one can contribute for sustainable growth of the booming sector. Sustainability meaning its financial, social, communicational, sharing, learning and knowledge creation dynamics, territorial and individual development, and other dimensions, which grant a holistic approach to Social Entrepreneurship and to the communication processes development among its actors, social entrepreneurs.

Thus, the key question is how Social Entrepreneurship (SE) and Communities of Practice (CoP) can contribute for the knowledge sharing and transfer processes dissemination? This question will help to define some guidelines of the networks communication processes potential of a specific group of actors (social entrepreneurs), in order to understand its influence in knowledge transfer and sharing and, consequently, in the construction of smart territories.

Additionally to Social Entrepreneurship development in Portugal, there are groups of social entrepreneurs gathering in Impact Communities (IC). These communities, along with other purposes, respond to a frequent need of social entrepreneurs to meet with others with similar objectives, to respond to their constant need to obtain knowledge, to learn, but also to share their learning with others. The IC are places to obtain answers to problems that social entrepreneurs face.

But an essential aspect in any community and in IC in particular is the way its members interact with each other, whether through moments of collaboration, sharing or observation / presence and how this interaction can be converted into greater or lesser involvement. It is essential because it will be this involvement that will revert to the sustainability and continuity of IC. Thus, this paper addresses precisely the challenges inherent in sustainability and the maintenance of an IC, based on the questions: what are the critical success factors for an IC to last in time? What should be ensured so that social entrepreneurs / their members continue to see value in their existence and not let it die?

The paper analyzes two phases of the methodology: the first one is related to the implementation of a pilot project of an IC in a rural region of the North of Portugal, with the support of a non-profit association, aimed at empowering social entrepreneurs and develop knowledge on the subject (IES-Social Business School1). The second phase is the analysis of semi-structured interviews with four specialties in the areas of networking and community building, Social Entrepreneurship and Learning.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Social Innovation Communities: Groups of people whose mindset is the meeting of solutions to problems they face, both in the development of their initiatives and in the implementation of the same in the territory.

Social Innovation: A disruptive idea or one of continuity with an existing one, but that allows an alternative to existing ways of doing, with the mission of creating value for society.

Social Entrepreneurship: Way of thinking the development and implementation of initiatives that includes value creation, the other, society, and not just profit.

Impact Communities: Communities of social entrepreneurs, whose objective is the value creation for society, through the promotion of positive impact on people's lives and territory.

Smart Territory: Geographic contexts considered as examples of sustainability and efficiency in areas of great importance for their development, always having the citizen in the center of their interest.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset