Article Preview
TopThe literature provides a lot of work in service identification approaches, ranging from top-down to bottom-up. In this section, we briefly review the most relevant work in service identification.
(Kazemi et al., 2011) have presented an automated method for identifying business services by adopting design metrics based on top-down decomposition of processes. This method takes a set of enterprise business processes as input and produces a set of non-dominated solutions representing appropriate business services using a multi-objective genetic algorithm.
(Azevedo et al., 2009) proposed a top-down approach for services identification from business process models, applying heuristics to define services from the semantic analysis of process elements such as business rules and business requirements, and from a syntactic analysis of process models according to its corresponding structural patterns.
(Kang et al., 2008) presented a method of service identification using ontology for product line. Primary, a Semantic relationship is derived through the mapping between feature modeling and ontology. Second, both service and service boundary are defined by semantic distance. Third, the method is proposed for feature grouping and candidate service refining service candidate which is the fittest service granularity.