Reimagining the Mathematics Curriculum Through a Cross-Curricular and Maker Education Lens

Reimagining the Mathematics Curriculum Through a Cross-Curricular and Maker Education Lens

Immaculate Kizito Namukasa, Marja Gabrielle Bertrand, Derek Tangredi, Jade Roy, Hiba Barek, Rachelle Campigotto, Kinful Lartebea Aryee
DOI: 10.4018/IJTEPD.324166
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Despite the positive impact of maker education on student learning, challenges towards its implementation in formal school settings still exist. There is limited research on maker education in teacher education programs and a lack of knowledge on how to integrate it into the mathematics classroom. To address these issues, the following research questions were examined: What is the nature of the productive design features of maker education for teacher candidates? What are the benefits and challenges of these opportunities for teacher candidates learning to teach mathematics? The methods used were a case study interlinked with design-based research. A total of 114 teacher candidates participated in the study. The research findings have implications for educators who design/implement maker education curricula into STEM courses. For educators and researchers, the maker education opportunities from this study contribute to further re-imagining learning competencies, pedagogy, and resources in teaching mathematics and other STEM disciplines.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

In the past 10 years, makerspaces have gained significant traction in K-12 schools (Sator & Bullock, 2017; Stager, 2014), and teaching through makerspaces is seen as an avenue to achieve the goals of re-imagined pedagogy in mathematics education (Bullock & Sator, 2018; Halverson & Sheridan, 2014; Kafai et al., 2014). In the traditional classroom, young children’s problem-solving experiences have been limited to problems that follow a specific procedure (taught in class) or a defined path (English & Watters, 2004). Children are rarely provided with opportunities to interpret a problem, or to find the solution to ill-defined problems by identifying, visualizing, modelling, and evaluating possible solutions (English & Watters, 2004). English and Watters (2004) explained that “mathematical modelling takes children beyond basic problem solving where meaning must be made from symbolically described word problems, to authentic situations that need to be interpreted and described in mathematical ways” (p. 336). The adoption of makerspace learning and teaching within formal education “is the deliberate positioning of student learning in contexts that require the drawing together of skills and knowledge from the areas of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) to create, construct, [model, solve a problem] and critique a product or artefact” (Blackley et al., 2017, p. 23).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 7: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 6: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2018)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing