Predicting Estimated Blood Loss and Transfusions in Gynecologic Surgery Using Artificial Neural Networks

Predicting Estimated Blood Loss and Transfusions in Gynecologic Surgery Using Artificial Neural Networks

Steven Walczak, Emad Mikhail
DOI: 10.4018/IJHISI.2021010101
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This chapter explores valuating the efficacy of using artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting the estimated blood loss (EBL) and also transfusion requirements of myomectomy patients. All 146 myomectomy surgeries performed over a 6-year period from a single site are captured. Records were removed for various reasons, leaving 96 cases. Backpropagation and radial basis function ANN models were developed to predict EBL and perioperative transfusion needs along with a regression model. The single hidden layer backpropagation ANN models performed the best for both prediction problems. EBL was predicted on average within 127.33 ml of measured blood loss, and transfusions were predicted with 71.4% sensitivity and 85.4% specificity. A combined ANN ensemble model using the output of the EBL ANN as an input variable to the transfusion prediction ANN was developed and resulted in 100% sensitivity and 62.9% specificity. The preoperative identification of large EBL or transfusion need can assist caregivers in better planning for possible post-operative morbidity and mortality.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Uterine fibroids occur in women of reproductive age between 4.5% and 30% of the time, with over 50% of those affected claiming it negatively impacted their life (Fuldeore, & Soliman, 2017; Jayakumaran, et al., 2017; Zimmermann, et al., 2012). Myomectomy is a surgical procedure to remove fibroids that leaves the uterus intact for future pregnancies. Myomectomies may be conducted using a variety of surgical techniques including both minimally invasive techniques and standard surgical non-minimally invasive techniques. However, myomectomies are not without risk. Perioperative morbidity occurs in as high as 39% of patients (Andrade, et al., 2017; Frederick, et al., 2002; Sawin, et al., 2000) and although much less likely mortality still occurs (Choo, Yeo, & Thomas, 1998; Hamoda, Tait, & Edmonds, 2009; Jin, et al., 2009; Katz, et al., 2001).

Estimated blood loss (EBL) during surgery has been shown to be a statistically significant (p < 0.05) indicator of all perioperative morbidities using a univariate logistic regression model and also an indicator of serious perioperative morbidities using a multivariate logistic regression (Carson, et al., 2002). In addition to indicating perioperative morbidity, EBL has also been shown to be a strong indicator for other surgical outcomes including hospital length of stay (Jarnagin, et al., 2002; Sørensen, et al., 2005) and recurrence of a carcinoma (Katz, et al., 2009). The ability to preoperatively predict blood loss would allow for improved implementation of blood conservation techniques and would alert surgeons to the likelihood of related complications (Yu, et al., 2013). However, EBL is extremely difficult to measure accurately (Algadiem, et al., 2016; Eipe, & Ponniah, 2006; Guinn, et al., 2013). Prior research emphasizes the need to develop more accurate mathematical models to determine EBL (Brecher, Monk, & Goodnough, 1997).

Actual blood loss, estimated by EBL, is the most significant reason for operative and postoperative transfusions (Chang et al., 2001; Stoller, Wolf, & St. Lezin, 1994). Transfusions help to reduce mortality in patients with significant intraoperative blood loss (Wu, et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2012) and have been associated with increased postoperative morbidities (Frederick, et al., 2002). Therefore, preoperative knowledge of EBL and transfusion requirements of myomectomy patients will enable surgeons and clinicians to be better prepared to deal with probable postoperative morbidities and possible mortality.

Predictive models in medicine are most commonly developed using regression (Xie, et al., 2017). Other popular machine learning-based predictive modelling methods for clinical decision making include artificial neural networks (ANNs) and decision trees (Kourou, et al., 2015; Xie, et al., 2017). Predicting EBL is correlated with predicting transfusions and should be amenable to similar predictive informatics strategies. Prior research shows that ANNs are both a frequently used and an effective problem solving method in medicine (Cruz, & Wishart, 2006; Cunningham, Carney, & Jacob, 2000; Dreiseitl, & Ohno-Machado, 2002; Shaikhina, & Khovanova, 2017; Walczak, 2018) and for this reason ANNs are selected to try and model both EBL and transfusions.

This article examines the use of separate ANNs to predict intraoperative EBL and also perioperative transfusions and additionally introduces the novel approach in medicine of developing an ensemble ANN to predict both EBL and transfusions simultaeneously. This addresses a gap in current research where ANNs have been used to predict transfusion requirements, but primarily for cardio-circulatory surgeries (Covin et al., 2003; Walczak & Scharf, 2000). Prior research has not utilized ANNs to predict EBL or transfusions for gynecologic surgeries. A positive outcome may be able to improve surgeon and other clinician decision making regarding the intraoperative and postoperative care of these patients to help reduce morbidities and mortalities.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 18: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 17: 2 Issues (2022)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2006)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing