Predicting End-User Satisfaction With Clinical Information Systems

Predicting End-User Satisfaction With Clinical Information Systems

Moatasem Ahmad Mahmood Al-Hasson, Emad Ahmed Abu-Shanab
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 21
DOI: 10.4018/IJISSS.2021070102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Clinical services in hospitals are too diversified and include different kinds of care patient needs. Clinical services need to be supported by clinical information systems (CIS). In this paper, the satisfaction of three categories of clinicians was tested including nurses and physicians working in a governmental hospital in Qatar. The study investigated the key variables affecting CIS users' satisfaction and the levels of users' satisfaction in Al Wakra Hospital. The research model incorporated five independent variables measuring including information quality, system quality, service quality, professional maturity, and personal innovativeness. A questionnaire was distributed to targeted end-users with a total of 296 usable responses. The necessary analyses were conducted, where results supported four out of five hypotheses. The adjusted coefficient of determination R2 was 0.714. Findings provide valuable insights for decision-makers in the healthcare sector in Qatar, where they contribute toward a better understanding of the reasons impacting end-user satisfaction.
Article Preview
Top

1. Background

Clinical services in hospitals are diversified and include different kinds of healthcare which patients require. There are two types of healthcare services provided in hospitals: direct and indirect care. For both kinds to be efficient, clinical documentation needs to be efficient as well. Documentation consists of written or visual explanations reflecting what the software does, uses, and processes such information (Aggelidis & Chatzoglou, 2012). Traditionally, paper-and-pen technique was used to reflect the care provided so that other care providers can take the clinical decision. Nowadays, clinical information systems (CISs) have become the major tool for documentation. CIS uses computers and networks to communicate patient’s information between different health care providers (Watfa, Majeed, & Salahuddin, 2016). CIS refers to the applications designed to reflect patient’s care by electronically documenting all relevant data using computers (Karimi, Poo, & Tan, 2015). A good definition can be as follows: a database management system that processes patients data in an aim to help make a proper clinical decision by healthcare providers. Supported by this database, an interface that access patients’ records to plan and evaluate healthcare provided (Medical Dictionary, 2019). In fact, the most important reason that helped shift from the paper-based documentation into the electronic one is the tremendous improvement in the field of information technology (IT).

Undoubtedly, CIS has improved the communication among those providers and made it much easier for them to reach the necessary information to complete their work. The system was a real shift in the way of doing the work (Watfa, Majeed, & Salahuddin, 2016). It has helped solve the problem of legibility that helped improved the decision-making process (Wilbanks, et al., 2018), (Baumann, Baker, & Elshaug, 2018). CIS has faced continuous improvements toward becoming a smart tool that has enhanced the capabilities of the care providers to give the best care possible and make their life easier (Aldosari, Al-Mansour, Aldosari, & Alanazi, 2018). On the other hand, there have been considerable consequences that hindered reaching the ideal utilization of the system. One of the most concerning consequences is the clinicians’ satisfaction, which severely impacted the success of system implementation. This is due to the fact that end users are the main stakeholders who can practically decide how efficiently the system can be utilized (Sebetci, 2018).

The challenge of end-user’s satisfaction is central to the case of Qatar, where significant investments to implement and improve the utilization of the CIS have been made in the public healthcare sector. Decision-makers aimed to improve the overall patient care provided. On the other side, it is well perceived among healthcare providers how the implemented system has improved communication of clinical information. Implementing new systems is typically accompanied by some obstacles that hinder reaching its best results. Based on that, this paper intends to find answers to the following research questions:

  • RQ 1: What are the key variables that affect CIS end-users satisfaction in Al Wakra Hospital?

  • RQ 2: What are the levels of CIS end-users satisfaction in Al Wakra Hospital?

This study targets healthcare providers, namely nurses and physicians, who provide direct and indirect patient care. The study focused on those professionals working in Al Wakra Hospital (AWH), a 325-bed capacity hospital that is a member of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). HMC is the dominant public healthcare provider in Qatar (Hamad Medical Corporation, 2019). AWH was accredited by the Joint Commission International (JCI) for meeting the standards of care and safety. It was also accredited by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) for committing to high standards in lab services. More so, it was recognized by the Surgical Review Corporation (SRC) as a center of excellence for hernia repair, bariatric surgery, and urology stone treatment. It is currently under process for application for more accreditations and recognitions (Hamad Medical Corporation, 2019). Around five years ago, a clinical information system (CIS) was purchased by HMC and was implemented in all hospitals under the umbrella of HMC.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing