Moving Target Detection Strategy Using the Deep Learning Framework and Radar Signatures

Moving Target Detection Strategy Using the Deep Learning Framework and Radar Signatures

M. Bharat Kumar., P. Rajesh Kumar
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 21
DOI: 10.4018/IJSIR.304400
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This paper presents deep RNN based FBF approach for the detection of moving target using the radar signatures. The FBF method is developed by the integration of fuzzy concept in the Bayesian fusion method. The FBF combines the results from the deep RNN, STFT, Fourier transform and matching filter to generate the final detection output from the received radar signal. The radar signatures are given as the input to the deep RNN for the detection of the target. Finally, the FBF combines the results from the deep RNN, STFT, Fourier transform and the matched filter to obtain the final decision regarding the detected target. The performance of the proposed deep RNN based FBF method is evaluated based on the metrics, like detection time, MSE and Missing target by varying the number of targets, antenna turn velocity, pulse repetition level, and the number of iterations. The proposed deep RNN based FBF method obtained a minimal detection time of 2.9551s, minimal MSE of 2683.80 and minimal Missing target rate of 0.0897, respectively.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Radar is used widely in defense and public security fields, like early warning detection, sea surface, and air target monitoring. The radar echo has low observability, due to the presence of complex characteristics of the motion of the target and the presence of complex background environment, such as city, land, and ocean, etc. Thus, the moving target detection technology with low observability becomes the key factor that affected radar performance. If the target's energy is weak, it results in a low signal-to-noise/signal-to-clutter ratio (SNR/SCR) in both the frequency and time domain (Chen, et al., 2018). The SAR sensors perform military task, such as reconnaissance, wide-area battlefield surveillance, and intelligence gathering (Yan, et al., 2013). In addition to the monitoring of the environment (Bhambere, et al., 2021), terrain mapping, and the evaluation of the natural disaster (Cofini, et al., 2014, Rupapara, et al., 2020) damage for the application of civilians, they can obtain high-resolution images of targets and the ground scenes. In military activities, surveillance, and monitoring of urban traffic (Petruccelli, 2013), the ground moving vehicles' detection within the strong ground clutter is important. Most of the research on the SAR systems has drawn attention in terms of moving targets, such as estimating the motion parameter and detecting the moving target and location of the motion parameter (Xu, et al., 2018).

While considering the target detection in terms of clutter suppression, the observation space should effectively separate the clutter and the target. The observation space concerning the signal processing extends gradually to the sparse domain (Li, et al., 2018; Chen, et al., 2017a), frequency domain (Shui, et al., 2016), space-time domain (Melvin, 2000), and time-frequency domain (Chen, et al., 2017b) from the initial time domain. However, the dimension of the observation space is expanded further for the dynamic and complex background for providing more degrees of freedom (DoFs) in signal processing (Chen, et al., 2013). The radar detection is connected closely with the diverse and complex types of targets. Hence, detecting the target using radar signal processing has complexity in detecting the target and reducing overall detection performance (Chen, et al., 2018). Most of the methods for detecting the moving target include the optical flow method, frame difference method, background modeling method, and feature detection method. In the frame difference method, the target is extracted by considering the difference between two adjacent frames (Luan, et al., 2011). Although the frame difference method had good performance in real-time, it had low accuracy detection. Based on the image sequence's spatio-temporal gradient, the optical flow method estimated the motion field (Xin, et al., 2014). In the optical field method, the changes in the motion field are calculated for detecting the moving targets. The drawbacks of the optical flow method are the poor anti-noise ability, complexity in the calculation, and poor performance in real-time processing (Dong, et al., 2019).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing