Mediating Role of Switch Leadership Between Dynamic Work Environment and Project Success

Mediating Role of Switch Leadership Between Dynamic Work Environment and Project Success

Riaz Ahmed, Imran Qamar Khan, Simon P. Philbin
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/IJITPM.290422
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

There is a limited research on the mediating role of the switch leadership style between the working environment and project success. Therefore, this study aims to examine the mediating role of switch leadership between the dynamic working environment and project success. This study adopted an online survey instrument to collect cross-sectional data from 160 project managers and team members of telecommunications companies in Pakistan. The path mediation analysis revealed partial mediation of switch leadership between the dynamic working environment and project success, Finding suggests that the Pakistani telecommunications sector is susceptible to changes in leadership styles, and the chances of project being successful could be greatly improved if the switch style of leadership is adopted by project managers. Moreover, researchers need to continue identifying different leadership styles and practitioners need to adopt different switch leadership styles not only to increase the chances of project success but also to counter the impacts of complexities found in IT projects.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Countering the effects of complexities and uncertainties can be a key issue for projects. The rapid change and advancement in the field of project management helps to overcome project complexities in order to achieve project objectives (Cleveland & Cleveland, 2020). In today’s world, there is a growing concern that business as usual is not a viable option anymore in organizations and continuing with failing models of leadership is no longer suitable for projects in such organizations (Bierwolf & Kemenade, 2017). Indeed, trends for doing business are changing as high-performers are operating differently (Horth & Vehar, 2014) with adaptation of new strategies (Smith & Cockburn, 2014). Uncertainties and complexities of the project environment are not well taken into account in information technology (IT) projects (Poveda Bautista, Diego-Mas, & Medina, 2018), which has prompted a plethora of research and publications elaborating and creating an opportunity for investigating project complexity within the realm of project management (Rezende, Blackwell, & Gonçalves, 2018).

In the dynamic work environment, motivated and creative leaders are required who involve team members through effective communication in complex tasks to the increase likelihood of project success (Rezvani, Khosravi, & Ashkanasy, 2018). The changing dynamics of the working environment with evolving technology (Winter, 2012) during the last decade has not only effected the daily activities of individuals (Berman, 2014) but also the organizations operating in high-tech sectors (Mathias, 2017). These changes have a significant impact on traditional leadership styles (Jakubik & Berazhny, 2017). Despite the availability of skilled human resource, funds, latest equipment and project management standards, IT projects are failing to achieve the required standards. The on-time delivery, trust issues, frequent employee turn-over, uncertain government policies (Ebad, 2018; Ko & Kirsch, 2017) and fierce competition call for an investigation of why IT projects continue to fail.

Leadership skills of effective project managers can be developed to improve project performance (Doan, Nguyen, & Nguyen, 2020). Effective leaders understand and adapt behavior according to the situation that they face (Laufer, 2012). Whether, a situation demands conflict resolution, or exploiting opportunities by expanding the range of choices, the impression on subordinates about their competence and expertise is determined by the style of leadership for a given situation (Yukl, 2013). In some cases leaders use different leadership styles in different situations to enhance project performance and challenge the status quo of relying on a single leadership style (Blaskovics, 2016a; Maner, 2016). Leaders evaluate subordinates and their degree of compatibility to the required project task or their degree of readiness (Flynn, Blackman, & Ugyel, 2013). Moreover, these degrees of willingness vary significantly, urging a leader to continuously adapt a suitable leadership style in order to influence the subordinates and maximize overall effectiveness (Silverstone, 2001).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing