Kindergarten Teacher Responses to a Contextualized Professional Development Workshop on STEAM Teaching

Kindergarten Teacher Responses to a Contextualized Professional Development Workshop on STEAM Teaching

Amanda Bennett, Faiza Jamil
DOI: 10.4018/IJTEPD.304871
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This study examined the supports and barriers encountered by kindergarten teachers when participating in a STEAM professional development (PD) workshop that took place in their own classrooms. This study draws on Practice-Based Professional Development framework and adult learning theories to guide the design of the workshop and analysis of results. A teacher focus group with five participants was conducted and analyzed through emergent coding. Teachers identified several supports and challenges when implementing strategies learned during the workshop, providing important insights on improving PD experiences in this innovative approach to education. This paper will present a reconceptualized approach to short-term PD interventions in STEAM that capitalizes on important best practices from recent coaching literature, yet maintains the low cost and time investments of traditional PD approaches. We describe participating kindergarten teachers’ responses to this PD intervention, as well as identify lessons learned to inform PD experiences in the future.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Theoretical Framework

The current study was influenced by the Practice-Based Professional Development (PBPD) framework (Ball & Cohen, 1999) which serves as an approach that focuses on integrating teacher learning of content, theories of learning, and curriculum and pedagogy into PD practices. Teacher development should emphasize the advancement of understandings and skills surrounding the effective educational practice. Based on this model, Harris et al. (2012) posit that six elements are important when developing a PD model: ‘(a) collective participation of teachers within the same school with similar needs; (b) basing professional development around the characteristics, strengths, and needs of the students in teachers’ classrooms; (c) attention to content knowledge needs of teachers, including pedagogical content knowledge; (d) opportunities for active learning and practice of the new methods being learned, including opportunities to see examples of these methods being used and analyze the work; (e) use of the materials and other artifacts during professional development that is identical to those being used in the classroom; and (f) feedback on performance while learning and before using these methods in the classroom so that understandings and skills critical in implementation are developed’ (p. 105).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 7: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 6: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2018)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing