Exploring Candidates' Initial Images of Similar Figures

Exploring Candidates' Initial Images of Similar Figures

C.E. Davis
DOI: 10.4018/IJTEPD.333516
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This article investigates preservice candidates' knowledge of similar figures while engaged in teacher-related mathematical tasks (TRMT) with the primary goal of developing a lesson plan on similar figures. This investigation was part of a larger study investigating candidate knowledge of what and how to teach proportional reasoning concepts while engaged in TRMT. The data collection and TRMT cycle included individual discussions and reflections, group planning and discussions, and group presentations. Individual candidates also wrote their teaching philosophies and math autobiographies, which were reviewed. While candidates appeared to grasp many of the aspects of the concept of similar figures and similarity, there was a lack of precision and strength in their representations. The knowledge base of the candidates in both mathematics and teaching varied. As the study progressed, candidates relied heavily on their subject matter knowledge to justify their images and ideas.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The exploration of pre-service candidates and their journey in education has been a longstanding pursuit. Over the years, much of the research in this area of education has revolved around two concepts: knowledge and practice (Oliveira & Henriques, 2021; Charalambous et al., 2020; Da Ponte & Chapman, 2015; Ball et al., 2008; Ma, 1999; Even, 1990; Shulman, 1986). What has been learned is that candidates need to be engaged in activities that enhance their understanding of what and how to teach mathematics. Stylianides and Stylianides (2006) define teacher-related mathematical tasks (TRMT) as encompassing this dual role through a series of activities that focus on a primary goal. Engaging in activities, such as TRMT is seen as crucial for candidates, as they strive to cultivate their knowledge and skills for effective teaching (Oliveira & Henriques, 2021; Akar, 2015; Da Ponte & Chapman, 2015; Ball, et al., 2008; Stylianides & Stylianides, 2006).

This investigation of pre-service candidate teachers' knowledge of similar figures was part of a larger study that investigated candidate knowledge of what and how to teach proportional reasoning concepts, while engaged in TRMT. The TRMT involved a combination of teaching and research methods. The research was based on standards from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics' (NCTM) which provide a vision for the teaching of mathematics (NCTM, 2000; NCTM, 2007). During the explorations of TRMT, researchers focused on understanding candidates’ initial images of similar figures, and with this focus, formulated the following research question:

When given opportunities to discuss and plan a lesson, what are candidates’ images of what and how to teach similar figures?

Therefore, this study has the potential to enhance the body of research concerning candidates’ images of similar figures while engaged in TRMT. It accomplishes this through a conceptual framework that supports candidates’ subject matter knowledge (SMK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). While the primary focus is on a group of initial licensure candidates, this research also provides insights into a teacher education course that implements TRMT.

Top

Conceptual Framework

Stylianides and Stylianides (2006) define TRMT as having a dual purpose. They are mathematics tasks that are connected to teaching, which also support the learning of mathematics and what is important to teach and help teachers to see how the mathematics relate to teaching. A “task” is described as a series of related activities focusing on ideas and aims promoting a goal (Stylianides & Stylianides, 2006). Lappan and Even (1989) state that to support students’ mathematical empowerment, “teachers themselves need to know mathematics and experience learning in ways that build a deep and flexible understanding of what mathematics is and what it means to do mathematics” (p.22). TRMT can be seen as a hybrid of two types of teaching experiments: classroom experiments (Borba & Confrey, 1993; Cobb & Steffe, 1983; Steffe, 1991) and candidate teacher development (Simon, 1995).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 7: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 6: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 5: 2 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 4: 2 Issues (2021)
Volume 3: 2 Issues (2020)
Volume 2: 2 Issues (2019)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (2018)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing