Enterprise Digital Transformation, Dynamic Capabilities, and ESG Performance: Based on Data From Listed Chinese Companies

Enterprise Digital Transformation, Dynamic Capabilities, and ESG Performance: Based on Data From Listed Chinese Companies

Lan Zhang, Yuwei Ye, Zixuan Meng, Ning Ma, Chia-Huei Wu
Copyright: © 2024 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/JGIM.335905
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Digital transformation improves the operational efficiency and perceptual capabilities of businesses and creates a foundation for fulfilling ESG responsibilities. The authors use the theories of technological innovation and dynamic capabilities and select a sample of 4054 listed companies with commercial integration of ESG rating data to explore the mechanisms through which digital transformation affects ESG performance. Dynamic capabilities are further divided into innovation changeability (IT), coordination integration capability (CI), and learning absorption capability (LA) to investigate the mediating effects and summarize the causal path of “digital transformation - dynamic capabilities - ESG performance.” The research focuses on the impact of digital technology on ESG performance with the aim of helping businesses utilize technology more effectively to build dual competitive advantages in digitization and ESG.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Given the rise of the fourth Industrial Revolution, the pace of enterprises' transformation to Industry 4.0 is gradually accelerating. The emergence of novel and powerful digital technologies, digital platforms, and digital infrastructure has greatly changed innovation and entrepreneurship (Satish et al., 2019). Digital transformation is defined as the use of new digital technologies, such as mobile, AI, cloud, blockchain and internet of things (IoT) technologies, to achieve significant business improvements, enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, or create new business models (Karl, et al., 2019). As a new enterprise development model, digitization is of great significance to the development of contemporary economy and society. Digital transformation is urgently needed for businesses to overcome survival challenges and to plan for future development. Digital transformation possesses powerful capabilities to innovate traditional business forms, operational methods, and profit models. Digital transformation’s technological, innovative, intelligent, and unique characteristics enable companies to gain new competitive advantages and become one of the factors influencing their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) responsibilities. Digital transformation brings more possibilities and opportunities for businesses to explore the positive impact of technology.

The ESG concept focuses on environmental management, social responsibility, and corporate governance. ESG considers both economic and social benefits and adapting to green, low-carbon objectives. ESG serves as a guiding principle for sustainable development and a practical tool for greening capital markets. In the new stage of economic development, companies not only need to enhance their own development quality and improve operational efficiency but also pay more attention to environmental protection, carbon emissions reduction, long-term development, and sustainability. ESG is an advanced approach that comprehensively evaluates a company's sustainable development from the three dimensions of environment (E), society (S), and governance (G). ESG also represents an important standard used by the international community to measure corporate green sustainability levels (Baker et al., 2021). Today's connected environment is characterized by ESG, a network of people, and organizations and equipment that constantly interact, talk and exchange information. These forms of communication show that information sharing, signaling, and brand value creation have evolved over the past decade (Lee et al., 2022). ESG performance, as a corporate evaluation standard and investment concept that focuses on corporate environmental, social and governance performance rather than financial performance, to a certain extent measures whether listed companies have sufficient social responsibility, reflects enterprises’ potential in sustainable development, and provides important support for the country to achieve green development. Given the rapid growth of global ESG investments, ESG has become a hot topic for policy makers, regulators, and investors and has been gradually included in the decision-making process of investment and financing (Wu et al., 2023).

Regarding the microeconomic consequences of corporate digital transformation, scholars have mainly explored the impact of corporate digital transformation on financial performance, corporate performance, and operational performance. Fadi et al. (2022) proposed that CTTI4.0 disclosure has a positive impact on financial performance. In addition, the study found that ESG practices moderated the relationship between CTTI4.0 disclosure and financial performance, suggesting that firms with better ESG performance tend to be more actively involved in CTTI4.0 disclosure and simultaneously have better financial performance (2022). Qi and CAI (2020) note that many derivative management costs are generated in the enterprise digital transformation process, which seriously weakens its effect on driving enterprise performance. Chen et al. (2019) note that the unique rhythm and trajectory of digital technology enables enterprises to carry out innovation and transformation, thus improving economic performance. He and Liu (2019) concluded through empirical research that enterprise digital transformation can significantly improve a company's business performance.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 32: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 31: 9 Issues (2023)
Volume 30: 12 Issues (2022)
Volume 29: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (1993)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing