The Dynamic Panels With Threshold Effect of China's OFDI on Host Country Technological Progress: An Empirical Analysis Based on Different Types of Countries Along the Belt and Road

The Dynamic Panels With Threshold Effect of China's OFDI on Host Country Technological Progress: An Empirical Analysis Based on Different Types of Countries Along the Belt and Road

Sai Tan
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 12
DOI: 10.4018/IJISSS.290544
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Using the dynamic panel threshold model and data of 41 countries along “the Belt and Road” from 2003 to 2017, this paper empirically tests the impact of China’s outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on technological progress of these countries and its threshold effect. The results show that OFDI exerts different effects on technological progress of countries along the route within different thresholds range. Based on the classification of different country types, when FD is below than the threshold value, China’s OFDI in transitional and developing countries has no significant impact on their technological progress, while developed countries have a more significant positive correlation; other, when FD is higher than the threshold value, both types of countries are significantly positively correlated, and the coefficient is greater in developed countries than in transitional and developing countries. In further research, it is divided into two periods based on the time node of 2013.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

With the continuous advancement of the Belt and Road initiative (BRI), China has deeply promoted economic cooperation with countries along the route, in which Outward Foreign Direct Investment is one of the a key areas. China’s OFDI on the countries along the route is not only the requirement of sustainable development for China, but also an important way of realizing leap-forward development for countries along the route. Statistics show that China’s OFDI flow was US$143.04 billion in 2018, falling of 9.6% than last year, which still ranked second in the world. And the direct investment flow to countries along the route was US$17.89 billion, accounting for 12.5% of the total. It turns out that the countries along the route have become a new growth point for China’s OFDI. In the meantime, the initiative promotes a strategic cooperation between countries and regions and forms a circle of beneficial and co-prosperity. This conforms to the demand of host country (Ch. Pan, 2017) and promotes the high-quality cooperation and development between China and countries along the route. However, China’s investment-related cooperation with these countries has been frequently questioned by some western media (Qiao, 2019), and voices like “China threat theory” and “Chinese predation theory” result in a phenomenon “buzz at home but fuss from the international community” during the construction of “the Belt and Road” (Ja and Lei, 2019). Furthermore, some even questioned that China’s OFDI comes from its geo-expansion strategy (Robert D, 2016). To sum up, such misunderstandings and doubts emerge from the uncertainty whether China’s OFDI is conducive to the development of countries along the route, or whether the construction achievements can be shared. In this context, this paper is of practical significance to guide the effects of China’s OFDI on the host countries’ technological progress, provides strong support for the high quality development of “the Belt and Road”, forms correct public opinions, eliminates the doubts from the countries along the route, increases their participation, and promotes the positive technology spillover effect of China’s OFDI.

This study focuses on the impact of China’s OFDI on the technological progress of countries along the route based on a balanced data of 41 countries from 2003 to 2019. Due to the large quantity of countries along the route, and most of them are transitional and developing countries except for a few developed ones, these countries may have different demands for FDI. Considering the lag effect of OFDI when it plays an effective role, by building a dynamic panel threshold model, we mainly tested the threshold effect of OFDI on the technological progress of host country from different country types and the different time periods proposed by the Belt and Road initiative, which is of great significance of dispelling doubts, improving the participation enthusiasm and promoting the smooth implementation of the BRI. This is conducive to establish a correct direction of world public opinion, enhance the enthusiasm of countries to participate in the construction of the Belt and Road, and provide an important experience support for the investment cooperation between China and countries along the route, so as to further promote the smooth implementation of the Belt and Road has important practical significance.

This paper is structured as follows: Second 2 describes the literature review; Section 3 introduces the empirical strategy; Section 4 details the empirical results and discussions; Section 5 provides the conclusions and policy implications.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing