Consumer Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Through Retail Brand Labels Disclosure

Consumer Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Through Retail Brand Labels Disclosure

Beatriz Casais, Andreia Teixeira, Cristina Fernandes
DOI: 10.4018/IJSESD.290320
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Retail brands were initially introduced as low quality brands with low prices. Currently, customers understand that these brands are valuable price/quality options and have a preference for them. The increased competition among distribution companies have forced retailers to increasingly introduce sustainable practices, including in own brands. This paper analyses the corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication through the packaging of retailers’ products. Following a content analysis of 377 packages of private labels from seven retail chains in Portugal, the authors concluded that there is CSR information in packages disclosing a variety of themes. A survey to 539 consumer indicate that consumer perceptions of CSR in packages correspond to the issues most valued. Health topics and national origin are better perceived and valued, even when they are not the most prevalent themes in packages. Environmental signals are lower perceived and valued, even when a similar or higher prevalence in packages.
Article Preview
Top

Background

The Value Creation of Retail Brands

Retail brands, also called private label brands or store brands (Utgard, 2018), were initially introduced in the market as basic versions of products with low quality and low prices as alternative options to manufacturer or national brands, in order to meet the expectations of market segments with low purchasing power (Ailawadi & Keller, 2004). However, the increased competition and the proliferation of retail chains have forced retailers to increase quality, innovation and differentiation in their own brands and consequently the market share of these brands have been growing (Hyman, Kopf, & Lee, 2010). Grocery stores started developing exclusive own retail brands to meet consumer expectations regarding the quality/price relation and managing brand equity for their brands (Luo, 2018). The consumer perception that the products achieve this outcome has determined the attraction of new customers, satisfaction and store loyalty (Binninger, 2008). Customers understand currently that retail brands are valuable for the relation between price and quality and have a greater preference for them in several product categories and not only food, as it was initially (Hyman et al., 2010; Jara & Cliquet, 2011).

Some retailers have gained exclusive value for their own brands, associating them with certain differentiating attributes and levels of quality (Beristain & Zorrilla, 2011; Cuneo, Lopez, & Yague, 2012). The capital of the brand characterized by the consumers' subjective assessment of distribution value is added in these situations (Semeijn, 2004). These attributes grant the creation of consumer preferences and form a positive brand image (Jara & Cliquet, 2011). In fact, the main attractiveness for retailer own-brands are brand image, what launches a communication challenge to supermarket chains (Loureiro, 2017), considering the stigma associated by the entrance of this brands as low quality and low price options, some years ago (Hyman et al., 2010). The sophisticated packaging, the considerable innovation added and the wide variety of products of retail brands create value for consumers (Ailawadi & Keller, 2004). A study concluded that customer loyalty is higher to retail brands than private brands (Azad, Zarifi, & Hozouri, 2013), also because of the perception about its origin being commonly the same of the manufacturer brands (Cuneo, Milberg, Alarcon-del-Amo, & Lopez-Belbeze, 2019).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 9 Issues (2022)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing