A Study of Lencioni's Model of Dysfunctional Groups

A Study of Lencioni's Model of Dysfunctional Groups

Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 19
DOI: 10.4018/IJeC.321557
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Personnel is an organization's most important resource, and it is important to manage them properly to provide maximum benefit to organizations. Many employees work in teams to create value. In the digital age, diverse teams are becoming the new norm. Diversity may be due to ethnicity, gender, culture, sexuality, or due to task-related knowledge, skills, opinions, and perspective differences. Many groups become productive over time, but some groups also become dysfunctional. This paper examines groups that work together and ultimately become dysfunctional to the extent that they have to be reassigned or dismantled. The authors use a three-stage model to explore why this happens. They use widely accepted Lencioni's five functional characteristics to study dysfunctional teams. In addition, they argue Lencioni's model should be revised to include an additional layer of lack of functional expertise. A revised Lencioni's model is proposed, and future research areas are also discussed. Managers should follow this model while creating groups to use resources at max.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Employees can make or break an organization. Employee resources must be used properly to provide benefits and pursue organizational goals. Many jobs are done in teams and team work is becoming a norm. According to Garnet Research in future, “People will swarm more often and work solo less. They'll work with others with whom they have few links, and teams will include people outside the control of the organization.” Corporation and its workforce are becoming borderless resulting in more and more teamwork. Many teams work well together, but others fall short. IBM’s Watson is an example of a diverse, productive team that developed a (https://www.businessinsider.com/why-the-healthcaregov-website-failed-at-launch-in-one-slide-2013-11) is an example of a dysfunctional team that did not produced product as planned and a new team had to make it functional. The question is why some groups succeed and others fail. Productive teams have been studied extensively in the literature, we focus on dysfunctional teams in this paper.

Teamwork is an important part of organizations and according to the U. S. Department of Labor, “When everyone in the workplace works together to accomplish goals, everyone achieves more”. Katzenbach and Smith (1993) defined team as, “A small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goal, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable”. In a borderless world, teams are becoming diverse and work 24/7 irrespective of time and place, distance, language, diversity or differences. Many teams do not succeed. Social loafing, fatigue, diversity, and group size are some of the factors often mentioned as contributing to this failure. One of the factor, diversity, and its impact on groups, has been studied by many researchers (Harrison & Klein, 2007;, Boiney, 2001) who have emphasized the importance of understanding and managing diversity to improve creativity and the quality of team performance. There are no clear results from these research and literature has provided conflicting evidence that either supports or opposes diverse group performance. Can diversity lead to dysfunctional groups? This paper attempts to address this issue.

The first section describes current literature on dysfunctional groups, followed by the model and experiment, and a discussion of dysfunctional groups. In the following section we discuss modification of Lencioni’s model. In addition, we provide a summary of the limitations of this study and directions for future research.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 7 Issues (2023)
Volume 18: 6 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing